Infosheet


Security appraisal procedure

The security appraisal procedure is mandatory for all project proposals under Horizon Europe and sets out the steps to determine if project proposals contain sensitive information and/or deliverables.

Programmes Security   Digital, Industry & Space  

Published on | 2 months ago

Last updated on | 1 month ago

Author Do you have an additional question? Or spotted a mistake? Don't hesitate to contact me!
Image of Pascal Verheye
Pascal Verheye

pascal.verheye@vlaio.be

About

As Horizon Europe deals with new technologies and innovations, the European Commission wants to make sure that these are not misused for the wrong purposes (e.g. crime) or that sensitive information falls in the wrong hands.

To this purpose they have set-up security procedures for projects submitted under their R&I framework programme. In Horizon 2020 this was called the security scrutiny procedure but in Horizon Europe it has been expanded and renamed to ‘security appraisal procedure’.

In contrast to Horizon 2020 the procedure is now mandatory for all project proposals though it has to be said that for most proposals this work will be limited to answering the questions of the self-assessment questionnaire.

Overview of the procedure

There are 3 steps of the procedure which in turn are also divided into phases.

  1. Security self-assessment by the applicant

All project proposals must fill in the security issues table as a self-assessment which contains some straight-forward questions. This is what most proposals will have to do. You can find this table in the standard application document.

For those calls that are submitted under security sensitive topics, a security section (application form part B security) must also be filled in. At the moment this is the case for the Space calls (cluster 4) and the civil security calls managed by DG Home (cluster 3). These files will immediately go to the security scrutiny phase and skip the first 2 phases of step 2.

  1. Security review by the granting authority, the Commission and national security expert

Only proposals above the threshold will undergo a security review. The first phase of this step is the pre-screening carried out by the granting authority (in casu competent DG or agency). Afterwards all these files are sent to DG Home which will take care of the screening phase. if in the screening phase it seems that more analysis is needed then the file will be transferred to the security screening group

The final phase is thus the security scrutiny in which a group of nationally appointed security experts will review the proposals and give their verdict. This might be no security concern, classification (limit the access) of certain deliverables or information, appointing a project security officer, install a security advisory board, organize security trainings for the staff involved in the project etc. The most strict judgment can be the non-funding of the proposal but this is extremely rare.

  1. Security checks and audits by the commission or the relevant funding body

Once the project is ongoing the staff of the European Commission can also perform checks and maybe an audit on the security requirements regarding the projects.

More information

The timeline can be long to get the full security clearance so it might not be concluded by the time the invitation letter is sent. However at the moment of the grant signature this procedure must be finalized.

If you want more information regarding this topic you can watch this webinar of the European Commission on Youtube and you can also check their guide on how to handle security sensitive projects. In case you have some specific questions you can send them to HOME-SECURITY-APPRAISAL@EC.EUROPA.EU

 

myHORIZON
- sign up for personalised information

We offer news and event updates, covering all domains and topics of Horizon 2020 & Horizon Europe.

Stay informed about what matters to you. By signing up, you can opt in for e-mail notifications and get access to a personalised dashboard that groups all news updates and event announcements in your domain(s).

Only for stakeholders located in Flanders

Testimonial

image of Autoship - a new and durable way of freight transport

Autoship - a new and durable way of freight transport

Autoship is, as the name suggests, an acronym for autonomous ship. Just like with self-driving cars, the possibilities of an unmanned boat seem endless. It can create more efficient freight transport, around the clock deliveries and these are just a few of the examples. The project has two societal challenges.

At first, De Vlaamse Waterweg was a bit hesitant as their experience with FP7 or Horizon 2020 projects was limited and they had not been very successful up until then. The fact that they were already doing basic research on the topic of autonomous boats, and the administrative help of NCP FLanders helped De Vlaamse waterweg to cross the line and get involved.

 

Read the full article for details  or Check out the other testimonials

© 2021 NCP Flanders. All rights reserved.